Read a paper without losing the caveats
Extracts what a study actually established, at what sample size, under what conditions — and separates the authors' claims from what the press release said.
For a contract, policy, or report where getting it wrong costs you. Separates what it obliges you to do from what it merely says, and flags the clauses worth a second read.
I have to act on this document, not just understand it. DOCUMENT: {{DOCUMENT}} MY POSITION: {{MY_POSITION}} Give me: **1. What this obliges me to do.** Only actual obligations on my side — deadlines, payments, notice periods, things I must not do. Quote the clause for each. Do not include obligations on the other party here. **2. What it lets the other side do.** Especially anything they can do unilaterally: change terms, terminate, increase a price, keep something of mine. **3. The three clauses I should read again myself.** The ones where the wording is doing more work than it appears to. Say what to watch for in each. **4. What is missing.** Things a document of this kind normally covers that this one does not. Absence is often the risk. **5. Plain-language summary.** Five sentences, no jargon, as if explaining to someone who has not read it. Rules: - Do not give legal, medical, or financial advice. Describe what the document says and what it leaves unsaid; the decision is mine. - Do not paraphrase a clause in a way that softens it. Quote when the exact wording matters. - If a section is ambiguous, say it is ambiguous rather than picking a reading. - If I have given you only part of the document, say what you cannot assess.
A prompt is a skill with the serial numbers filed off. Install it once and your agent reaches for it on its own.
Paste this into ChatGPT, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, or whatever you use:
Install the summarise-a-document-you-have-to-act-on skill globally from https://promptsbuddy.com/prompts/summarise-a-document-you-have-to-act-on/skill.md.claude/skills/summarise-a-document-you-have-to-act-on/SKILL.md
---
name: summarise-a-document-you-have-to-act-on
description: "For a contract, policy, or report where getting it wrong costs you. Separates what it obliges you to do from what it merely says, and flags the clauses worth a second read. Use when the user asks for help with research tasks like reading, documents, contracts."
license: CC-BY-4.0
metadata:
source: https://promptsbuddy.com/prompts/summarise-a-document-you-have-to-act-on
author: "Lena Fischer"
version: "1.0"
---
# Summarise a document you actually have to act on
For a contract, policy, or report where getting it wrong costs you. Separates what it obliges you to do from what it merely says, and flags the clauses worth a second read.
## Inputs to collect first
Ask the user for anything below that they have not already given you. Do not
invent values for these.
- `DOCUMENT` — The document. Paste the whole thing if you can — partial text produces partial answers. (e.g. A lease, an MSA, an insurance policy, a 40-page report.)
- `MY_POSITION` — Which side you're on and what you're deciding. (e.g. I'm the tenant, deciding whether to sign a two-year term.)
## Instructions
I have to act on this document, not just understand it.
DOCUMENT:
{{DOCUMENT}}
MY POSITION: {{MY_POSITION}}
Give me:
**1. What this obliges me to do.** Only actual obligations on my side —
deadlines, payments, notice periods, things I must not do. Quote the clause
for each. Do not include obligations on the other party here.
**2. What it lets the other side do.** Especially anything they can do
unilaterally: change terms, terminate, increase a price, keep something of mine.
**3. The three clauses I should read again myself.** The ones where the wording
is doing more work than it appears to. Say what to watch for in each.
**4. What is missing.** Things a document of this kind normally covers that
this one does not. Absence is often the risk.
**5. Plain-language summary.** Five sentences, no jargon, as if explaining to
someone who has not read it.
Rules:
- Do not give legal, medical, or financial advice. Describe what the document
says and what it leaves unsaid; the decision is mine.
- Do not paraphrase a clause in a way that softens it. Quote when the exact
wording matters.
- If a section is ambiguous, say it is ambiguous rather than picking a reading.
- If I have given you only part of the document, say what you cannot assess.
## Notes from people who use this
- Section 4 catches the most: no cap on liability, no exit clause, no defined response time.
- Always read the three flagged clauses yourself. This narrows where to look — it doesn't replace looking.
- For anything with real money or legal exposure, this is preparation for talking to a professional, not a substitute for one.
---
Summarise a document you actually have to act on · by Lena Fischer · v1.0
From PromptsBuddy — https://promptsbuddy.com/prompts/summarise-a-document-you-have-to-act-on
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Every prompt is also available at /prompts/summarise-a-document-you-have-to-act-on/skill.md — see all install options.
A summary of a contract tells you what it is about. What you actually need is narrower and more useful: what you are now on the hook for. Splitting your obligations from theirs is the difference between "I read it" and "I know what I signed."
Section 4 is the one people are surprised by. The risk in a document is rarely a scary clause you can see — it is the missing liability cap, the absent termination right, the undefined response time. Models are good at this because they have seen thousands of documents of each kind and know what normally appears.
Extracts what a study actually established, at what sample size, under what conditions — and separates the authors' claims from what the press release said.
Surfaces the criterion you're actually optimising for, tests each option against being wrong, and names the information that would settle it — or tells you it's already a coin flip.