A design critique partner that argues back
Critiques a screen or flow against stated goals, then argues the opposite position — so you get a real second opinion instead of polite agreement.

Podcast episode
Using models as critique partners rather than generators — and why the work gets better the moment you stop asking for designs and start asking for arguments.

Audio drops soon
Why generated UI is a dead end for real products
Audio drops soon — subscribe and it lands when it goes live.
A year of asking models to produce interface designs is mostly wasted effort. The model generates the median of everything it has seen. The median is exactly what you do not want on a real product.
What works is inverting the relationship: bring your own work and ask to be argued with.
Pretty frames are cheap. Product taste is not. When you ask for “a modern dashboard,” you get every dashboard average at once. Useful for moodboards. Useless for shipping.
Instead of “make me three options,” ask: “Here is my flow. Attack the weak steps. Name the user who gets stuck. Do not compliment anything.”
The model becomes a critic with infinite patience. You keep authorship.
“Make it feel premium” invites flattery. “A first-time user must complete invite in under two minutes without reading a tooltip” gives the critic something to test.
Ask for two mutually exclusive directions with reasons. Tweaking padding forever is how critique turns into noise.
Final visual judgment. Brand voice. The decision to cut a feature. The model can stress-test your reasoning. It should not own the call.
Critiques a screen or flow against stated goals, then argues the opposite position — so you get a real second opinion instead of polite agreement.
A standing instruction that removes the praise, the restating, and the closing summary — so the reply is only the part you actually needed.