Landing page copy built from your customers' own words
Mines real customer language from reviews, tickets, and calls, then writes a page that uses their phrasing instead of your internal vocabulary.
Most positioning compares you to competitors nobody evaluated. This works from the real alternative — a spreadsheet, an intern, or doing nothing — and finds the wedge from there.
PRODUCT: {{PRODUCT}} WHAT THEY DO TODAY: {{ALTERNATIVES}} WHO FEELS IT: {{WHO}} **1. Rank the alternatives** by how many of these people actually use them. Doing nothing is an alternative and is usually the leader — say so if it is. **2. For each alternative**, give: what it genuinely does well, what it costs in time or risk, and the specific moment it breaks down. Be fair to it. If a spreadsheet is fine for most of this job, say a spreadsheet is fine. **3. The wedge.** The one situation where the leading alternative fails badly enough that someone would change what they do. One sentence. **4. Three positioning statements** built on that wedge, each in the form "For [who] who [situation], [product] is the [category] that [capability], unlike [alternative] which [limitation]." Make the category name plain — if you invent a category, say why an existing one won't do. **5. The strongest argument against us**, stated as the buyer would state it. Rules: - Do not compare us to funded competitors unless I named them. The real competitor is usually inertia. - No superlatives, no "seamless", no "10x". - Every claim must trace to what I told you. Write [NEEDS PROOF] rather than inventing evidence.
Tools for this prompt
Where the input below comes from. The ones marked needed change the output a lot — fallbacks for each are further down.
This prompt is only as good as what you feed it. Web search covers anything public — these are the inputs it can't reach.
Which alternatives people actually search for, and the volume behind each — so the ranking in step 1 is evidence rather than a guess.
Don't have it: Without it, say the ranking is a guess rather than presenting it as data.
Only tools that web search cannot replace are listed. Anything public — reviews, job ads, papers, salary data — an agent can already fetch, so it is not listed here. No paid placements or affiliate links; if that changes, this line will say so.
A prompt is a skill with the serial numbers filed off. Install it once and your agent reaches for it on its own.
Paste this into ChatGPT, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, or whatever you use:
Install the positioning-from-the-alternatives skill globally from https://promptsbuddy.com/prompts/positioning-from-the-alternatives/skill.md.claude/skills/positioning-from-the-alternatives/SKILL.md
---
name: positioning-from-the-alternatives
description: "Most positioning compares you to competitors nobody evaluated. This works from the real alternative — a spreadsheet, an intern, or doing nothing — and finds the wedge from there. Use when the user asks for help with marketing tasks like positioning, marketing, strategy."
license: CC-BY-4.0
metadata:
source: https://promptsbuddy.com/prompts/positioning-from-the-alternatives
author: "Rony"
version: "1.0"
---
# Position against what people actually do instead
Most positioning compares you to competitors nobody evaluated. This works from the real alternative — a spreadsheet, an intern, or doing nothing — and finds the wedge from there.
## Inputs to collect first
Ask the user for anything below that they have not already given you. Do not
invent values for these.
- `PRODUCT` — What it is and what it does, plainly. No pitch. (e.g. A reconciliation tool that flags mismatches between Stripe and your ledger.)
- `ALTERNATIVES` — What people genuinely do today — include 'nothing' and 'a spreadsheet' if true. (e.g. A shared Google Sheet; a junior analyst two days a month; or living with the errors.)
- `WHO` — The specific person who feels the problem, not the buying committee. (e.g. The one finance person at a 40-person company who owns month-end close.)
## Tools this works with
Do not require any of these. If one is unavailable, use the stated fallback and
say which input is missing rather than inventing it.
- **Ubersuggest** (needed) — Which alternatives people actually search for, and the volume behind each — so the ranking in step 1 is evidence rather than a guess. If its MCP server is connected, fetch this yourself.
- Without it: Without it, say the ranking is a guess rather than presenting it as data.
- https://neilpatel.com/ubersuggest/
## Instructions
PRODUCT: {{PRODUCT}}
WHAT THEY DO TODAY: {{ALTERNATIVES}}
WHO FEELS IT: {{WHO}}
**1. Rank the alternatives** by how many of these people actually use them.
Doing nothing is an alternative and is usually the leader — say so if it is.
**2. For each alternative**, give: what it genuinely does well, what it costs
in time or risk, and the specific moment it breaks down. Be fair to it. If
a spreadsheet is fine for most of this job, say a spreadsheet is fine.
**3. The wedge.** The one situation where the leading alternative fails badly
enough that someone would change what they do. One sentence.
**4. Three positioning statements** built on that wedge, each in the form
"For [who] who [situation], [product] is the [category] that [capability],
unlike [alternative] which [limitation]." Make the category name plain — if
you invent a category, say why an existing one won't do.
**5. The strongest argument against us**, stated as the buyer would state it.
Rules:
- Do not compare us to funded competitors unless I named them. The real
competitor is usually inertia.
- No superlatives, no "seamless", no "10x".
- Every claim must trace to what I told you. Write [NEEDS PROOF] rather than
inventing evidence.
## Notes from people who use this
- If your positioning doesn't name 'doing nothing' as the main competitor, it's probably wrong.
- Section 2's 'be fair to it' is what makes the output usable — conceding the true thing is what earns the rest.
- [NEEDS PROOF] markers become your customer-research backlog.
---
Position against what people actually do instead · by Rony · v1.0
From PromptsBuddy — https://promptsbuddy.com/prompts/positioning-from-the-alternatives
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Every prompt is also available at /prompts/positioning-from-the-alternatives/skill.md — see all install options.
Positioning exercises default to a competitor grid, and most buyers never evaluated those competitors. They were doing something manual, or nothing, and the real question is what would make them stop.
Forcing "doing nothing" onto the ranked list changes the whole output, because the argument against inertia is a different argument from the one against a rival product.
Section 2 asks what the alternative does well. Marketers resist this and it is the highest-signal part of the exercise: knowing precisely where the spreadsheet is fine tells you exactly which customers not to chase, which is usually most of them.
Mines real customer language from reviews, tickets, and calls, then writes a page that uses their phrasing instead of your internal vocabulary.
Under 90 words, one specific observation about them, one ask small enough to say yes to. Includes the test for whether it's actually personalised or just mail-merged.